AI Observatory / Compare
long-form analysis and research-heavy workflows
Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro
Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro are both tracked in Model Radar. This page focuses on long-form analysis and research-heavy workflows. Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro exposes the larger context window. Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro is cheaper on prompt input pricing.
200,000
Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet ctx
1,048,576
Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro ctx
$3.00 / 1M
Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet prompt
$1.25 / 1M
Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro prompt
01 / Table
Side-by-side snapshot.
The compare table stays neutral: price, context, modalities, and parameter support on one surface.
| Field | Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Input modalities | text, image, file | text, image, file, audio, video |
| Output modalities | text | text |
| Context length | 200,000 | 1,048,576 |
| Max completion tokens | 64,000 | 65,536 |
| Prompt price | $3.00 / 1M | $1.25 / 1M |
| Completion price | $15.00 / 1M | $10.00 / 1M |
| Supported parameters | include_reasoning, max_tokens, reasoning, stop, temperature, tool_choice, tools, top_p | include_reasoning, max_tokens, reasoning, response_format, seed, stop, structured_outputs, temperature, tool_choice, tools, top_p |
02 / Guidance
Best-for guidance.
These compare pages stay practical: what each model looks better suited for, based on the current catalog metadata.
Anthropic
$3.00 / 1M
Anthropic: Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Deep analysis, Coding workflows, Cross-modal work, Long context
Deep analysis
Coding workflows
Cross-modal work
Long context
Google
$1.25 / 1M
Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro
Deep analysis, Coding workflows, Cross-modal work, Voice and audio
Deep analysis
Coding workflows
Cross-modal work
Voice and audio
03 / Colophon
Routes and exits.
Each compare page links back into the model detail pages and the public hub.